内容精选
Content Selection
《英国医学杂志》 研究文章
The BMJ Research
Quantifying the risks of non-oncology phase I research in healthy volunteers: meta-analysis of phase I studies [量化非肿瘤I期研究对健康志愿者的风险:I期试验的荟萃分析]
- 分享:
BMJ 2015; 350 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h3271 (Published 26 June 2015)
Cite this as: BMJ 2015;350:h3271
Authors
Ezekiel J Emanuel, chair, vice provost for global initiatives, Gabriella Bedarida, medical director, Kristy Macci, project manager, Nicole B Gabler, associate scholar, Annette Rid, senior lecturer, David Wendler, senior investigator
Abstract
Objective: To quantify the frequency and seriousness of adverse events in non-oncology phase I studies with healthy participants.
Design: Meta-analysis of individual, healthy volunteer level data.
Setting: Phase I studies with healthy volunteers conducted between September 2004 and March 2011 at Pfizer’s three dedicated phase I testing sites in Belgium, Singapore, and the United States. These included studies in which drug development was terminated.
Participants: 11 028 participants who received the study drug in 394 distinct non-oncology phase I studies, which involved 4620 unique individuals. A total of 2460 (53.2%) participants were involved in only one study, whereas others participated in two or more studies.
Main outcome measures: Adverse events classified as mild, moderate, and severe as well as serious adverse events—defined by the Food and Drug Administration as events that result in death, a life threatening event, admission to hospital, prolongation of existing hospital stay, a persistent or major disability, or a congenital anomaly or birth defect. Pfizer researchers of phase I trials determined adverse events, and serious adverse events were those filed with the FDA.
Results: Overall, 4000 (36.3%) participants who received the study drug experienced no adverse events and 7028 (63.7%) experienced 24 643 adverse events. Overall, 84.6% (n=20 840) of adverse events were mild and 1.0% (n=255) were severe. 34 (0.31%) serious adverse events occurred among the 11 028 participants who received the study agent, with no deaths or life threatening events. Of the 34 serious adverse events, 11 were related to the study drug and seven to study procedures, whereas 16 were unrelated to a study drug or procedure, including four that occurred when the participant was receiving a placebo. Overall, 24.1% (n=5947) of adverse events were deemed to be unrelated to the study drug. With a total of 143 (36%) studies involving placebo, 10.3% (n=2528) of all adverse events occurred among participants receiving placebo. The most common adverse events were headache (12.2%, n=3017), drowsiness (9.8%, n=2410), and diarrhea (6.9%, n=1698). Research on drugs for neuropsychiatric indications had the highest frequency of adverse events (3015 per 1000 participants).
Conclusion: Among 11 028 healthy participants who received study drug in non-oncology phase I studies, the majority (85%) of adverse events were mild. 34 (0.31%) serious adverse events occurred, with no life threatening events or deaths. Half of all adverse events were related to the study drug or to procedures. Extrapolation of these data to other types of phase I studies, especially with biological agents, may not be warranted.