内容精选

Content Selection

《英国医学杂志》 研究文章

The BMJ Research

Cervical screening and risk of adenosquamous and rare histological types of invasive cervical carcinoma: population based nested case-control study [宫颈筛查与浸润性宫颈鳞腺癌和其他组织类型癌的风险:基于人群的巢式病例对照研究]

  • 分享:

BMJ 2019; 365 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1207 (Published 03 April 2019)
Cite this as: BMJ 2019;365:l1207

Authors
Jiayao Lei, Bengt Andrae, Alexander Ploner, Camilla Lagheden, Carina Eklund, Sara Nordqvist Kleppe, Jiangrong Wang, Fang Fang, Joakim Dillner, K Miriam Elfström, Pär Sparén

Abstract
Objectives To examine the association of cervical cytology screening with the risk of adenosquamous cell carcinoma (ASC) and rare histological types of invasive cervical carcinoma (RICC), using comprehensive registry data, and to assess tumour human papillomavirus status of ASC and RICC.

Design Nationwide, population based, nested case-control study.

Setting Sweden.

Participants All cases of invasive cervical carcinoma in Sweden during 2002-11 (4254 confirmed cases after clinical and histopathological review). 338 cases were neither squamous cell carcinoma nor adenocarcinoma, including 164 cases of ASC and 174 cases of RICC (glassy cell carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, small cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma). 30 birth year matched controls from the general Swedish population were matched to each case by applying incidence density sampling.

Main outcome measures Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios, interpreted as incidence rate ratios, for risk of ASC and RICC in relation to screening status and screening history, adjusted for education. Human papillomavirus distribution of ASC and RICC was based on available archival tumour tissues from most Swedish pathology biobanks.

Results Women with two screening tests in the previous two recommended screening intervals had a lower risk of ASC (incidence rate ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to 0.34) and RICC (0.34, 0.21 to 0.55), compared with women without any test. High risk human papillomavirus was detected in 148/211 (70%) cases with valid human papillomavirus results from tumour tissues. The risk reduction among women with tumours that were positive (incidence rate ratio 0.28, 0.18 to 0.46) and negative (0.27, 0.13 to 0.59) for high risk human papillomavirus was similar, compared with women who did not attend any test.

Conclusions Cervical screening is associated with reduced risk of ASC and RICC, and most ASC and RICC are positive for high risk human papillomavirus. This evidence provides a benchmark for evaluating future cervical screening strategies.